[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] Speed up caldata/eeprom handling for ar71xx/ath79

[Adrian Schmutzler]

So we both step back, same situation again ;-)

I only just read the "Something like this for ar71xx, ath79 and ramips, untested." in Dmitry's proposal, so I would do the following:

Merge my patches, so we have the speed-up (without much code change) quickly.

At some later point either Dmitry or I can/should take up a unified approach and test it thoroughly.

Best

Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-bounces at lists.openwrt.org] On
> Behalf Of Dmitry Tunin
> Sent: Montag, 25. Februar 2019 19:01
> To: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey at gmail.com>
> Cc: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk at adrianschmutzler.de>; openwrt-
> devel at lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] Speed up caldata/eeprom
> handling for ar71xx/ath79
> 
> I suggest Adrian's. I was too lazy to patch them all. Only merging
> this what matters.
> 
> пн, 25 февр. 2019 г. в 20:27, Christian Lamparter <chunkeey at gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Friday, February 22, 2019 7:52:37 PM CET Dmitry Tunin wrote:
> > > пт, 22 февр. 2019 г. в 21:48, Adrian Schmutzler
> <freifunk at adrianschmutzler.de>:
> > > >
> > > > Based on the ipq40xx commit from chunkeey, I tried to do the same for
> > > > ar71xx/ath79.
> > > >
> > > I want to add that without this patch firmware extraction is not fast
> > > enough to get it in time after a flash. That's why wireless needs a
> > > restart.
> >
> > I have a question for you too. There are currently two competing patches
> > for the ath79 10-ath9k-eeprom extraction:
> >
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1046790/
> >
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1047062/
> >
> > Now, Dmitry' was faster with his version, but Adrian's version
> > patches everything so which one should it be?
> >
> > (I'll write some more about the future of the extraction in the
> > other thread).
> >
> > Cheers
> > Christian
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/attachments/20190225/dd07435f/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel