[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] Speed up caldata/eeprom handling for ar71xx/ath79
Dmitry Tunin
hanipouspilot at gmail.com
Mon Feb 25 13:04:04 EST 2019
пн, 25 февр. 2019 г. в 21:01, Dmitry Tunin <hanipouspilot at gmail.com>:
>
> I suggest Adrian's. I was too lazy to patch them all. Only merging
> this what matters.
>
> пн, 25 февр. 2019 г. в 20:27, Christian Lamparter <chunkeey at gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Friday, February 22, 2019 7:52:37 PM CET Dmitry Tunin wrote:
> > > пт, 22 февр. 2019 г. в 21:48, Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk at adrianschmutzler.de>:
> > > >
> > > > Based on the ipq40xx commit from chunkeey, I tried to do the same for
> > > > ar71xx/ath79.
> > > >
> > > I want to add that without this patch firmware extraction is not fast
> > > enough to get it in time after a flash. That's why wireless needs a
> > > restart.
> >
> > I have a question for you too. There are currently two competing patches
> > for the ath79 10-ath9k-eeprom extraction:
> >
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1046790/
> >
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1047062/
> >
> > Now, Dmitry' was faster with his version, but Adrian's version
> > patches everything so which one should it be?
> >
> > (I'll write some more about the future of the extraction in the
> > other thread).
> >
> > Cheers
> > Christian
> >
> >
Sry for upcommenting. I think that speeding up mac patching is not
really important, because it isn't too slow for a few bytes. But there
is no harm.
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
More information about the openwrt-devel
mailing list