OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

[Gregers Baur-Petersen]

On 18/01/2024 17.50, Dave Taht wrote:
> tee-hee. For the record, I would prefer less (and less buggy) offloads
> than offloads, and to work on scaling software better to multi-cores.
> 
> I also would love to find a chip where fq_codel could be offloaded,
> but with open source for the offload, since the nss drivers are
> slightly broken...
> 
> I also would like a pony.
> 
Not sure if a pony is the extra addition/feature I need. I'm more of a 
dog person ;-)

> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:40 AM Chuanhong Guo <gch981213 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 12:23 AM Fernando Frediani <fhfrediani at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, interesting. Is it enough to give it the necessary performance boost
>>> when doing NAT ? Is it capable of doing it on the chip or does it do on
>>> the CPU ? Reading about it seems to be a software thing although seems
>>> there are hardware capable devices as well. How comparable is this to a
>>> chip that has NAT offload capability ?
>>
>> MT7981 is such a chip with NAT offload capability, and the
>> flow-offload driver mentioned in other threads is actually
>> a driver for this hardware block.
>> Since it's a cost-down MT7986 I would imagine this particular
>> feature is the same between them:
>>
>> HW NAT
>> − Etherent/WiFi
>> − Wired speed
>> − IPv4 routing, NAT, NAPT
>> − IPv6 routing, DS-Lite, 6RD
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Chuanhong Guo
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openwrt-devel mailing list
>> openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
>> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
> 
> 
> 

-- 
  -----------------------------------------------------
  Gregers Baur-Petersen
  Anthropologist
  -----------------------------------------------------