Restructuring OpenWRT developer documentation
Javad Rahimipetroudi
javad.rahimipetroudi at essensium.com
Mon Dec 11 05:59:20 PST 2023
Dear Rich,
Thanks a lot for your response,
To answer your question:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 2:42 PM Rich Brown <richb.hanover at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Javad,
>
> First off, I want to thank you for thinking so hard about the OpenWrt Developer Guide. I worked a lot on the user guide back in the LEDE days. Because I wasn't going to be writing code, I never spent much time on the developer guide, and it's terrific to see someone making this effort.
>
> A few questions about your proposal, both for you and for the other developers on this list:
>
> - Are you suggesting simply moving pages from one place in the hierarchy to another?
Yes, At the first steps, we just reconstruct the existing knowledge.
When everything has been placed in the right place, we can add/remove
internal contents of the pages.
> - Or would some/many pages need to be rewritten/split up/combined?
At the moment, not too many pages need to be modified. Just some pages
may be combined.
> - Do you expect to continue using the Dokuwiki system, or converting the content to some other content management system?
As I'm not a maintainer, It really depends on the community.
> - Having invested in this effort, how can we check the result for correctness? (I imagine there are many pages that contain simple, but outdated info.)
We will preserve everything, if it doesn't go well, we can use the old info.
>
> I hope your inquiry kicks off a robust discussion. Thanks again.
>
> Rich Brown
Best Regards,
Javad
>
>
> >
> > Dear OpenWRT developer,
> >
> > I hope this message finds you well. As a user of OpenWRT, I would like
> > to express my appreciation for the excellent work you have done in
> > creating such a comprehensive documentation. However, I have noticed
> > that the current structure can be challenging for new users to
> > navigate, which can be discouraging for them.
> >
> > In an effort to help improve the user experience, I would like to
> > suggest a restructuring scheme based on the Buildroot user manual. I
> > believe that this scheme could make the documentation more accessible
> > and user-friendly, which would in turn help attract more users to
> > OpenWRT.
> >
> > I understand that you have put a lot of effort into creating the
> > documentation, and I want to assure you that my intention is not to
> > criticize your work. Rather, I hope that my suggestion can contribute
> > to the continued success of OpenWRT.
> > The new structure:
> > -----------------------------------
> > Developer guide
> > * Overview
> > * OpenWRT source code
> > * Getting the source code
> > * Working with GitHub
> > * Revision number calculation
> > * Build system:
> > * Build System essentials
> > * System setup
> > * Linux
> > * MacOS
> > * Windows (WSL)
> > * Setting up a build server in VirtualBox
> >
> > * Build system usage
> > * Quick image-building guide
> > * Using build environments
> > * Overriding Build Options
> > * Using the SDK
> > * Cross Compiling your application
> > * Using External Toolchain
> > * Image Builder frontends
> > * Using the Image Builder
> > * OpenWrt Feeds
> >
> > * Adding new packages to OpenWRT
> > * "Hello, world!" package for OpenWrt
> > * Preparing, configuring, and building the necessary tools
> > * Adjusting the PATH variable
> > * Conclusion
> > * Creating a simple “Hello, world!” application
> > * Creating the source code directory and files
> > * Compiling, linking, and testing the application
> > * Conclusion
> > * Creating a package from your application
> > * Creating a package feed for your packages
> > * Creating the package manifest file
> > * Conclusion
> > * Including your package feed into OpenWrt build system
> > * Including the new package feed into the OpenWrt build system
> > * Updating and installing feeds
> > * Conclusion
> > * Building, deploying and testing your application
> > * Building the package
> > * Deploying and testing your package
> > * Removing your package
> > * Conclusion
> > * Migrating to use GNU make in your application
> > * Why use GNU make ?
> > * Creating a makefile
> > * Testing the makefile using native tools
> > * Modifying the package manifest, and testing the build
> > * Conclusion
> > * Patching your application: Adding new files
> > * About patches
> > * Preparing the source code
> > * Creating the first patch
> > * Including the first patch into the package
> > * Conclusion
> > * Create a sample procd init script
> > * Patching your application: Editing existing files
> > * Creating the second patch
> > * Conclusion
> > * Adding existing packages to OpenWRT
> > * Autotools packages
> > * Cmake packages
> > * Meson packages
> > * Packages with other specific build systems
> > * Patching a package ( Working with patches)
> > * Using Dependencies
> > * Debugging
> > * GNU Debugger
> > * Device management in OpenWRT
> > * Adding a new device
> > * Adding new device support
> > * Adding new platform support
> > * Device support policies / best practices
> > * Device Tree Usage in OpenWrt (DTS)
> > * Mounting Block Devices
> > ----------------------------------------------
> > Thank you for your consideration.
> > The full structure is attached.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Javad Rahimipetroudi
> > <OpenWRT_Proposal.txt>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > openwrt-devel mailing list
> > openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
> > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>
More information about the openwrt-devel
mailing list