[RFC PATCH 7/7] realtek: Netgear GS110TPPv1: define port LEDs
Sander Vanheule
sander at svanheule.net
Fri Jul 29 06:31:14 PDT 2022
On Fri, 2022-07-29 at 14:58 +0200, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
> On 16-07-2022 21:09, Sander Vanheule wrote:
> > Add the port LEDs for lan1-lan8 to the device tree for the GS110TPP v1.
> > To reproduce the same behaviour as stock firmware, green should be
> > LINK/ACT 1G, and amber should be LINK/ACT 100M/10M:
> >
> > for i in $(seq 1 8); do
> > echo 13 > /sys/class/leds/green:lan-$i/rtl_hw_trigger
> > echo realtek-switchport > /sys/class/leds/green:lan-$i/trigger
> > echo f > /sys/class/leds/amber:lan-$i/rtl_hw_trigger
> > echo realtek-switchport > /sys/class/leds/amber:lan-$i/trigger
> > done
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander at svanheule.net>
> > ---
> > .../dts-5.10/rtl8380_netgear_gs110tpp-v1.dts | 30 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/linux/realtek/dts-5.10/rtl8380_netgear_gs110tpp-v1.dts
> > b/target/linux/realtek/dts-5.10/rtl8380_netgear_gs110tpp-v1.dts
> > index 1ff209cee363..897699bea2c3 100644
> > --- a/target/linux/realtek/dts-5.10/rtl8380_netgear_gs110tpp-v1.dts
> > +++ b/target/linux/realtek/dts-5.10/rtl8380_netgear_gs110tpp-v1.dts
> > @@ -43,3 +43,33 @@
> > &uart1 {
> > status = "okay";
> > };
> > +
> > +#define LAN_LED_LABEL(p, n) STRINGIZE(p ## n)
> > +#define LED_LABEL_GREEN(p) LAN_LED_LABEL(green:lan-, p)
> > +#define LED_LABEL_AMBER(p) LAN_LED_LABEL(amber:lan-, p)
> > +#define NETGEAR_LED(_phy, _port) \
> > + led@ ## _phy ##.0 { \
> > + reg = < _phy 0 >; \
> > + label = LED_LABEL_GREEN(_port) ; \
> > + }; \
> > + led@ ## _phy ## .1 { \
> > + reg = < _phy 1 >; \
> > + label = LED_LABEL_AMBER(_port) ; \
> > + }
> > +
> > +&switchcore {
> > + port-leds {
> > + compatible = "realtek,rtl8380-port-led";
> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + NETGEAR_LED(8,1);
> > + NETGEAR_LED(9,2);
> > + NETGEAR_LED(10,3);
> > + NETGEAR_LED(11,4);
> > + NETGEAR_LED(12,5);
> > + NETGEAR_LED(13,6);
> > + NETGEAR_LED(14,7);
> > + NETGEAR_LED(15,8);
> > + };
> > +};
> ugh, is it relaly worth it to do this? can we not just write it out; yes
> it's a lot of writing (you can use the define to generate it and copy
> paste it ;p)
I agree it's a bit opaque, and it doesn't allow you to add a label to the second port LED. But I
was writing this by hand and didn't want to do endless copy-pasting when modifying the LED list.
The list also misses two LEDs, for device ports 10 and 11, so now I'm doubting if I actually tested
this...
Best,
Sander
More information about the openwrt-devel
mailing list