[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] iproute2: revert add libcap support, enabled in ip-full
Mathias Kresin
dev at kresin.me
Sun Mar 15 18:40:35 EDT 2020
05/03/2020 23:29, Alin Năstac:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 8:34 PM Mathias Kresin <dev at kresin.me> wrote:
>>
>> This reverts commit a6da3f9ef746101b84a6f530f5a40de28341b69a.
>
> Not exactly a revert, since it keeps HAVE_CAP logic.
Sure, I want to make sure that HAVE_CAP is really disabled.
>> The libcap isn't as optional as the commit messages suggests. A hard
>> dependency to the libcap package is added, which is only available in
>> the external packages feed. Therefore it is impossible to package
>> ip-full without having the external packages feed up and running, which
>> is a regression to the former behaviour.
>
> The libcap support is by all means optional, otherwise iproute2 build
> will fail when its missing.
You describe exactly the issue I hit while building ip-full. During
development I don't have any external/third-party feeds installed. And
the OpenWrt base system shouldn't depend on external/third-party feeds.
These feeds are an add on and by no means a requirement.
> Besides, your commit actually removes this
> dependency. If this is not a living proof of the facultative nature of
> this dependency, I don't know what else is.
Sorry, I don't get what you're trying to say.
> One would argue that ip-full should correspond to the full fledged
> version of the packet. If the dependency of an external package is the
> issue, how about making a different variant with HAVE_CAP support? It
> could be called ip-really-full (or ip-fullest).
Try to get libcap into the OpenWrt base system and enable HAVE_CAP
afterwards?
Mathias
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
More information about the openwrt-devel
mailing list