Fate of 4.14 targets
Adrian Schmutzler
mail at adrianschmutzler.de
Fri Aug 7 10:38:38 EDT 2020
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-bounces at lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of mail at adrianschmutzler.de
> Sent: Dienstag, 4. August 2020 16:43
> To: openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: Fate of 4.14 targets
>
> Hi together,
>
> with bcm47xx/bcm53xx bumped to 5.4 now (thanks!), we are left we the
> following targets that (most likely) won't be moved to 5.4 anymore:
>
> 4.19: cns3xxx
> 4.14: ar71xx, at91, ath25, pistachio, rb532, samsung, uml
>
> Now, where 20.xx comes closer, I wonder whether we should remove the
> 4.14 targets _before_ branching.
> Those are already two LTS kernel versions behind, the probability that
> somebody will bump them to an even newer kernel after 20.xx is quite small.
> Despite, if we drop them before the branch, we only have to drop them
> once. :-) After having reminded about the situation of the named targets
> several times, I don't think anything will change if we wait any longer with
> this step.
>
> The only remaining targets with 4.14 support would be ramips and arc770
> then.
FYI: For illustration, I've put together a staging tree including everything up to the final removal of kernel 4.14 here:
https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/staging/adrian.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/remove414
https://github.com/adrianschmutzler/openwrt/commits/remove414
Both trees are equivalent, just the "viewer" is different :-)
Best
Adrian
>
> Thoughts/opinions?
>
> Best
>
> Adrian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/attachments/20200807/ca45d68f/attachment.sig>
More information about the openwrt-devel
mailing list