[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/4] kernel: add backported phy/phylink/sfp patches

[Etienne Champetier]

Hello Russell,

Le mar. 26 nov. 2019 à 14:50, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
<linux at armlinux.org.uk> a écrit :
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:07:43AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > René,
> >
> > I can see your reply in the OpenWrt archives, but I never received
> > it, so I can't reply to it...  (I'm not subscribed to openwrt-devel.)
> >
> > Yes, it could be made generic I suppose, if you understand the
> > OpenWrt build system and where stuff needs to be placed.  Any
> > suggestions where these should go?
> >
> > Sorry, but I've already spent many hours trying to get the OpenWrt
> > build system to a state that I was able to build just a kernel and
> > associated kmod packages that I don't have the patience to try and
> > delve into the amazingly complex makefiles that someone's dreamt up...
> > My impression is that the build system is designed to keep people out!
> >
> > Russell.
>
> All,
>
> Some guidance would be most helpful.  Silence on the other hand
> will result in nothing changing.

For faster response try IRC #openwrt-devel

> It's been suggested privately by Telus that they go in
> target/linux/generic/backport-4.19.  What about numbering, how
> do the patch numbers get allocated?  Do I just pick something at
> random?
>
> Some clues would be really useful.

This page might have some answers
https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-developer/build-system/use-patches-with-buildsystem#naming_patches

Etienne

>
> --
> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
> According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
>

_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel