[OpenWrt-Devel] Wrong patch status

[Adrian Schmutzler]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-bounces at lists.openwrt.org] On
> Behalf Of Rosen Penev
> Sent: Freitag, 1. März 2019 03:17
> To: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey at gmail.com>
> Cc: OpenWrt Development List <openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org>; Adrian
> Schmutzler <mail at adrianschmutzler.de>
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Wrong patch status
> 
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 3:31 PM Christian Lamparter <chunkeey at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday, February 28, 2019 7:52:06 PM CET Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Dmitry’s patch
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [OpenWrt-Devel] ath79: speed up ath9k-eeprom extraction
> > >
> > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1046790/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > got marked “Superseded” together with my old stuff.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > However, my latest patchset is supposed to be _on top_ of this patch,
> > > not to supersede it (_my_ own old patches are correctly superseded…);
> > > so status there should be updated.
> >
> > K, I re"newd" Dimitry's patch, but I think you hit the problem right on
> > the head whit went down: "my latest patchset is supposed to be _on
> > top_ of this patch [...]". Because I saw that your earlier patches series
> > v1 and (then later v2) conflicted with Dmitry's patch and archieved them
> > all back then. (In fact, now I'm not sure if I set the patch to
> > superseeded when you sent v1, v2 or v3. If it's important to know the exact
> > time, I think Dmitry could tell when he got the notification from patchwork.)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Christian
> >
> > PS: Please check your mailbox, I think Rosen Penev gave you a
> > Tested-by: tag that got seemingly lost. Having this feedback from
> > others is a valuable commodity.
> This is true. I've also tested this patchset on an Archer C7v2. Works fine.
> 
> Does patchwork add the tag automatically?

It did, but for the v1-Patchset.

I actually remembered the Tested-by and looked when I did the new patchset, but did not find it anymore (due to some circumstances...)

Since I have to resend anyway, I will check whether the Tested-by is still applicable and add it then.

Best

Adrian

> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > openwrt-devel mailing list
> > openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
> > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/attachments/20190301/a20a6c7a/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel