[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] ipq40xx: add support for FritzBox 7530

David Bauer mail at david-bauer.net
Wed Feb 27 07:03:21 EST 2019


Hello Christian,

On 26.02.19 23:17, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> Hello David,
> 
> On Tuesday, February 26, 2019 12:15:41 AM CET David Bauer wrote:
>> On 25.02.19 23:10, Christian Lamparter wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 6:02:21 PM CET Christian Lamparter wrote:
>>>> On Monday, February 18, 2019 11:58:34 PM CET David Bauer wrote:
>>>>> diff --git a/target/linux/ipq40xx/files-4.14/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019-fritzbox-7530.dts b/target/linux/ipq40xx/files-4.14/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019-fritzbox-7530.dts
>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>> index 0000000000..b2a33468bb
>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>> +++ b/target/linux/ipq40xx/files-4.14/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq4019-fritzbox-7530.dts
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,305 @@
>>>>> +&pcie0 {
>>>>> +	status = "okay";
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	ranges = <0x81000000 0 0x40200000 0x40200000
>>>>> +			0 0x00100000   /* downstream I/O */
>>>>> +			0x82000000 0 0x48000000 0x48000000
>>>>> +			0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
>>>>
>>>> Let me dig out my MR33 (will have to wait until the Weekend) and see if this
>>>> should be put into the qcom-ipq4019.dtsi as well.
>>>
>>> And it didn't work. While the pcie enumeration worked fine. 
>>> The QCA9887 was no longer attaching. As soon as the driver was
>>> loaded it failed due to:
>>>
>>> [    8.888466] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0142)
>>> [    8.934145] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to wake up device : -110
>>> [    8.935258] ath10k: failed to probe PCI : -110, retry-count: 0
>>> [    8.949596] ath10k 4.19 driver, optimized for CT firmware, probing pci device: 0x50.
>>> [    8.989503] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to wake up device : -110
>>> [    8.989899] ath10k: failed to probe PCI : -110, retry-count: 1
>>> [    9.005086] ath10k 4.19 driver, optimized for CT firmware, probing pci device: 0x50.
>>> [    9.046821] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to wake up device : -110
>>> [    9.049851] ath10k: failed to probe PCI : -110, retry-count: 2
>>> [    9.062448] ath10k 4.19 driver, optimized for CT firmware, probing pci device: 0x50.
>>> [    9.099055] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to wake up device : -110
>>> [    9.099442] ath10k: failed to probe PCI : -110, retry-count: 3
>>> [...]
>>> [    9.489869] ath10k: failed to probe PCI : -110, retry-count: 10
>>> [    9.503780] ath10k_pci: probe of 0000:01:00.0 failed with error -110
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> But I think we can fix the problem. Because according to the old
>>> qcom-ipq40xx.dtsi I dug up:
>>>
>>> <https://github.com/gl-inet/openwrt-imagebuilder-ipq806x/blob/master/build_dir/target-arm_cortex-a7_uClibc-1.0.14_eabi/linux-ipq806x/linux-3.14.77/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq40xx.dtsi#L631>
>>>
>>> The non-prefetchable memory area window size should be 0x00d00000.
>>>
>>> 	ranges =	<0x81000000 0 0x40200000 0x40200000 0 0x00100000>, /* downstream I/O */
>>> 				<0x82000000 0 0x40300000 0x40300000 0 0x00d00000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
>>>
>>> (yes, I'll be preparing a patch for linux-msm-arm. Can you please let
>>> me know if does indeed finally let you enumerate the device?)
>>
>> It seems to work with your proposed change:
>>
>> [    0.042117] OF: PCI: host bridge /soc/pci at 40000000 ranges:
>> [    0.042152] OF: PCI:    IO 0x40200000..0x402fffff -> 0x40200000
>> [    0.042171] OF: PCI:   MEM 0x40300000..0x40ffffff -> 0x40300000
>> [    0.259505] qcom-pcie 40000000.pci: link up
>> [    0.259649] qcom-pcie 40000000.pci: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
>> [    0.259671] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-ff]
>> [    0.259687] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io  0x0000-0xfffff]
>> (bus address [0x40200000-0x402fffff])
>> [    0.259700] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem
>> 0x40300000-0x40ffffff]
>> [    0.259742] pci 0000:00:00.0: [17cb:1001] type 01 class 0x060400
>> [    0.259776] pci 0000:00:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x00000fff 64bit]
>> [    0.259829] pci 0000:00:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot
>> [    0.260015] PCI: bus0: Fast back to back transfers disabled
>> [    0.260195] pci 0000:01:00.0: [8086:09a9] type 00 class 0x028000
>> [    0.260312] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x007fffff]
>> [    0.260790] pci 0000:01:00.0: supports D1 D2
>> [    0.260797] pci 0000:01:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D1 D3hot D3cold
>> [    0.261043] PCI: bus1: Fast back to back transfers disabled
>> [    0.261095] pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 8: assigned [mem 0x40800000-0x40ffffff]
>> [    0.261112] pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem
>> 0x40300000-0x40300fff 64bit]
>> [    0.261136] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x40800000-0x40ffffff]
>> [    0.261164] pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01-ff]
>> [    0.261180] pci 0000:00:00.0:   bridge window [mem 0x40800000-0x40ffffff]
>> [    0.261891] pcieport 0000:00:00.0: AER enabled with IRQ 93
>>
>> See
>> https://github.com/blocktrron/openwrt/commit/cc1a94b2e1616d33698852df38ae23f72f193b74
>>
>> How should we proceed on this device? Should i resend a v3 or will you
>> remove the ranges property and backport the patch you prepare for upstream?
> 
> Sorry for the late reply, I added a rebased version
> on top of the latest changes) into my staging tree:
> https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/staging/chunkeey.git;a=commit;h=206a40911118f24c062ccdfc24dfc3fdd653c71a 
> 
> And it turned out that there was also a pcie msi irq fix
> https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/staging/chunkeey.git;a=commit;h=307f6a6ed6cfca4c0d3cb5dc4dc5493ec3f41e1c
> it just goes on and on and on...
> 

Thanks! I will test an image built from your staging tree this evening
and give feedback.

Best wishes
David

> Regards,
> Christian
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
> 

_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel



More information about the openwrt-devel mailing list