[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] Speed up caldata/eeprom handling for ar71xx/ath79

Adrian Schmutzler mail at adrianschmutzler.de
Mon Feb 25 13:00:17 EST 2019


Hi,

I like Dmitry's approach as it will reduce duplicate code.

I would be happy to send patches for the "rest" (what I did more than him) based on his patch.

I just interpreted the comment

> The only problem here is that not all platforms need it.

as an objection to the unified approach, so I sent my patches representing a "smaller" change.

Best

Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-bounces at lists.openwrt.org] On
> Behalf Of Christian Lamparter
> Sent: Montag, 25. Februar 2019 18:28
> To: openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
> Cc: Dmitry Tunin <hanipouspilot at gmail.com>; Adrian Schmutzler
> <freifunk at adrianschmutzler.de>
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] Speed up caldata/eeprom
> handling for ar71xx/ath79
> 
> Hello,
> 
> On Friday, February 22, 2019 7:52:37 PM CET Dmitry Tunin wrote:
> > пт, 22 февр. 2019 г. в 21:48, Adrian Schmutzler
> <freifunk at adrianschmutzler.de>:
> > >
> > > Based on the ipq40xx commit from chunkeey, I tried to do the same for
> > > ar71xx/ath79.
> > >
> > I want to add that without this patch firmware extraction is not fast
> > enough to get it in time after a flash. That's why wireless needs a
> > restart.
> 
> I have a question for you too. There are currently two competing patches
> for the ath79 10-ath9k-eeprom extraction:
> 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1046790/
> 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1047062/
> 
> Now, Dmitry' was faster with his version, but Adrian's version
> patches everything so which one should it be?
> 
> (I'll write some more about the future of the extraction in the
> other thread).
> 
> Cheers
> Christian
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/attachments/20190225/7b9e7a78/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


More information about the openwrt-devel mailing list