[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ath10k-ct: update and use version based on 4.19

[Ben Greear]

On 12/10/18 2:23 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> On 12/10/18 10:46 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
>> On 12/10/18 1:35 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>>> ---
>>>    package/kernel/ath10k-ct/Makefile                  |  10 +-
>>>    ...h-all-IEs-for-variant-before-falling-back.patch |   8 +-
>>>    ...-controlling-support-for-various-chipsets.patch | 544
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>    ...02-ath10k-4.16-use-tpt-trigger-by-default.patch |  39 +-
>>>    4 files changed, 580 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/package/kernel/ath10k-ct/Makefile
>>> b/package/kernel/ath10k-ct/Makefile
>>> index d47ab8655c..e763135b92 100644
>>> --- a/package/kernel/ath10k-ct/Makefile
>>> +++ b/package/kernel/ath10k-ct/Makefile
>>> @@ -8,14 +8,14 @@ PKG_LICENSE_FILES:=
>>>      PKG_SOURCE_URL:=https://github.com/greearb/ath10k-ct.git
>>>    PKG_SOURCE_PROTO:=git
>>> -PKG_SOURCE_DATE:=2018-09-29
>>> -PKG_SOURCE_VERSION:=b9989fbd5d6e3269b3e49ab3ec71b4174a02209e
>>> -PKG_MIRROR_HASH:=67bb1c81518aea5880757d521023db25190d9cca21ba67bf1c7e577efd287430
>>>
>>> +PKG_SOURCE_DATE:=2018-11-01
>>> +PKG_SOURCE_VERSION:=6c3a6262317f3240013014e79a570693009c0235
>>> +PKG_MIRROR_HASH:=15c832dd49064c9b03c7012b1a50bfb3000227a750f830e832c5fd1f1fe8bfdf
>>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I just pushed the most recent code.  Nothing critical, so it can be used
>> later.
> 
> Thanks I will update, this patch anyway misses a description and a
> Signed-off-by line.
> 
> I ran into this problem:
> 
> ath10k-4.19/wmi.c: In function 'ath10k_dfs_radar_report':
> ath10k-4.19/wmi.c:4179:4: error: 'struct pulse_event' has no member
> named 'msg'
>    pe.msg[0] = 0;
>      ^
>    CC [M]  ath10k-4.19/hw.o
> 
> I haven't yet investigated further what is the problem, but it seams to
> be related to your last commit.

I just pushed a commit that should fix that.

I guess the new radar debugfs info will not be in OpenWRT unless someone
wants to port the ath patch as well.  Probably it is not of general interest
anyway.

Thanks,
Ben

> 
>> Are there any other patches you'd like to see applied to my 4.19
>> ath10k-ct driver to make
>> inclusion in openwrt easier?
> 
> Currently this is ok, the list of patches we have on top of your is very
> small the the changes in this patch, the rest is for older ath10k-ct
> versions and can probably be dropped anyway.
> 
> Currently we only have two patches for led support on top of your and
> they are sadly not yet in mainline.
> 
> Hauke
> 


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel