[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/8] ramips: improve mt7621 spi wait ready function
Michael Lee
igvtee at gmail.com
Sat Oct 10 23:54:28 EDT 2015
use loops_per_jiffy, spi clock speed and write bytes to get the
spi loop count. if loop to 0 than spi operation timeout.
remove usleep. we only write max up to 9 bytes to spi device.
use busy loop would be better.
Signed-off-by: Michael Lee <igvtee at gmail.com>
---
...0061-SPI-ralink-add-mt7621-SoC-spi-driver.patch | 32 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/ramips/patches-3.18/0061-SPI-ralink-add-mt7621-SoC-spi-driver.patch b/target/linux/ramips/patches-3.18/0061-SPI-ralink-add-mt7621-SoC-spi-driver.patch
index a412cf4..3304ac5 100644
--- a/target/linux/ramips/patches-3.18/0061-SPI-ralink-add-mt7621-SoC-spi-driver.patch
+++ b/target/linux/ramips/patches-3.18/0061-SPI-ralink-add-mt7621-SoC-spi-driver.patch
@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@
+ void __iomem *base;
+ unsigned int sys_freq;
+ unsigned int speed;
++ u16 wait_loops;
+ struct clk *clk;
+ spinlock_t lock;
+
@@ -216,6 +217,11 @@
+ reg = mt7621_spi_read(rs, MT7621_SPI_MASTER);
+ reg &= ~(0xfff << 16);
+ reg |= (rate - 2) << 16;
++
++ /* some tolerance. double and add 100 */
++ rs->wait_loops = (8 * HZ * loops_per_jiffy) /
++ (clk_get_rate(rs->clk) / rate);
++ rs->wait_loops = (rs->wait_loops << 1) + 100;
+ rs->speed = speed;
+
+ reg &= ~SPIMASTER_LSB;
@@ -241,21 +247,15 @@
+ return 0;
+}
+
-+static inline int mt7621_spi_wait_till_ready(struct spi_device *spi)
++static inline int mt7621_spi_wait_ready(struct mt7621_spi *rs, int len)
+{
-+ struct mt7621_spi *rs = spidev_to_mt7621_spi(spi);
-+ int i;
-+
-+ for (i = 0; i < RALINK_SPI_WAIT_MAX_LOOP; i++) {
-+ u32 status;
++ int loop = rs->wait_loops * len;
+
-+ status = mt7621_spi_read(rs, MT7621_SPI_TRANS);
-+ if ((status & SPITRANS_BUSY) == 0) {
-+ return 0;
-+ }
++ while ((mt7621_spi_read(rs, MT7621_SPI_TRANS) & SPITRANS_BUSY) && --loop)
+ cpu_relax();
-+ udelay(1);
-+ }
++
++ if (loop)
++ return 0;
+
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
+}
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@
+ u32 data[9] = { 0 };
+ u32 val;
+
-+ mt7621_spi_wait_till_ready(spi);
++ mt7621_spi_wait_ready(rs, 1);
+
+ list_for_each_entry(t, &m->transfers, transfer_list) {
+ const u8 *buf = t->tx_buf;
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@
+ val |= SPITRANS_START;
+ mt7621_spi_write(rs, MT7621_SPI_TRANS, val);
+
-+ mt7621_spi_wait_till_ready(spi);
++ mt7621_spi_wait_ready(rs, 36);
+
+ mt7621_spi_set_cs(spi, 0);
+
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@
+ u32 data[9] = { 0 };
+ u32 val = 0;
+
-+ mt7621_spi_wait_till_ready(spi);
++ mt7621_spi_wait_ready(rs, 1);
+
+ list_for_each_entry(t, &m->transfers, transfer_list) {
+ const u8 *buf = t->tx_buf;
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@
+ val |= SPITRANS_START;
+ mt7621_spi_write(rs, MT7621_SPI_TRANS, val);
+
-+ mt7621_spi_wait_till_ready(spi);
++ mt7621_spi_wait_ready(rs, 36);
+
+ mt7621_spi_set_cs(spi, 0);
+
--
2.3.6
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
More information about the openwrt-devel
mailing list