[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] Fix missing dependencies for libuClibc++.so.0
John Szakmeister
john at szakmeister.net
Mon Feb 2 09:16:15 EST 2015
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Sławomir Demeszko
<s.demeszko at wireless-instruments.com> wrote:
[snip]
> I just tested and found that also a dot in filenames can be a problem. For
> example if we would have "some.file.so" then it matches also "some2file.so"
> and it could not detect missing dependency. So -qxF is a more than bit
> better.
Perhaps you can update your patch then so that it applies cleanly to
master? I cannot apply it, but you'll have a better chance of getting
it accepted if it applies cleanly. :-)
You'll also need to sign off on it. The Submitted Patches details
what they look for:
<https://dev.openwrt.org/wiki/SubmittingPatches>
Section 10 talks about the sign off.
-John
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
More information about the openwrt-devel
mailing list