[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] ubus: Correct usage of timeout on poll function

Karl Vogel karl.vogel at gmail.com
Mon Dec 7 02:35:52 EST 2015


As the man page explains:

"Specifying a timeout of zero causes poll() to return immediately,
even if no file descriptors are ready."

The use of 0 as timeout could cause libubus to busy loop if the
socket was non-blocking. For blocking sockets, this was less
apparent as the subsequent read() would then block.

Signed-off-by: Karl Vogel <karl.vogel at gmail.com>
---
 libubus-io.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libubus-io.c b/libubus-io.c
index 9d3ac6c..e6d4236 100644
--- a/libubus-io.c
+++ b/libubus-io.c
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static void wait_data(int fd, bool write)
 	struct pollfd pfd = { .fd = fd };
 
 	pfd.events = write ? POLLOUT : POLLIN;
-	poll(&pfd, 1, 0);
+	poll(&pfd, 1, -1);
 }
 
 static int writev_retry(int fd, struct iovec *iov, int iov_len, int sock_fd)
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ void __hidden ubus_poll_data(struct ubus_context *ctx, int timeout)
 		.events = POLLIN | POLLERR,
 	};
 
-	poll(&pfd, 1, timeout);
+	poll(&pfd, 1, timeout ? timeout : -1);
 	ubus_handle_data(&ctx->sock, ULOOP_READ);
 }
 
-- 
2.6.3
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel



More information about the openwrt-devel mailing list